Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Changing revenue sources for media

Rebekah Baldwin
Edited by: Rachel Bunn
9/30/09

Information can spread like wildfire over the Internet, which many argue is a good thing for our society, but wildfire is hard to control, and when you can’t control something, it’s hard to charge for it.

When the Internet first started becoming a source of media, the industry didn’t have a model to charge for online content. As a result, illegal downloading flourished, and newspapers, knowing they had to create an online presence, started putting their stories up for free. Paying customers began to expect their music, news, and other online content free of charge.

In response to this, the music business has started to exploit other revenue sources. Ringtones, merchandise sales, and song placement in movies, TV shows, and commercials, have all become more important ways to generate profit than ever before.

Some in the music business have even learned to take advantage of the benefits that free music has to offer. Lindsey Epperly, a third-year music business certificate student at the University of Georgia and street team director for a band called the Dirty Guv’nahs, is an advocate of using free music as a promotional tool.

“I think it allows the artist to build a growing relationship with their fans, helps them connect, and often promotes their group, pages, and mailing lists by directing them to the site where they're giving away music.”

The music industry might be able to replace some of the loss of recorded music sales with other revenue streams, but it will be harder for the news industry to survive without their traditional 3-legged stool: subscriptions, newsstand sales, and advertising.

With both subscription numbers and newsstand sales down, newspapers and magazines have to rely more and more on a single source of income- advertising.

Not all publications are ready to abandon circulation and newsstand revenues however.

“Marketing for circulation is an ongoing strategic part of the newspaper business, even though we recognize that the internet is a viable way to get our product out there,” says Jenna Wages, Strategic Innovative Director of Marketing at the Athens Banner-Herald. “We’re not going to just give up one one area of our business because its not doing well.”

For The Fayette Citizen, a local paper that covers Fayette County, Georgia, a single source of income is nothing new. The paper has always been free, and survives on advertising revenue alone.

A publication that survives solely on advertising could potentially be a source of ethical conflict, but Joyce Beverly, the Fayette Citizen’s publisher, says she has no concerns on this issue.

“I don’t have a single ethical problem with it. Really, we don’t run into many problems. If you want an advertorial I’ll sell you one,” Beverly says.

Even if the ethical issues are taken out of the equation, there are other problems associated with relying on a single source of income. If advertising dollars dry up, the publication has no other revenue source to back it up.

This has become a problem in the current economic climate, as total advertising expenditures were down nearly 17 percent in 2008, and internet advertising fell for the first time since its introduction according to a report by the Newspapers Association of America. Additionally, the competition for classified ads with Craigslist has significantly reduced newspapers’ advertising revenue.

But Beverly believes it is still possible for publications to survive on advertising alone.

“I really believe that you can survive on ad revenue. Google’s the biggest company in the world, and they get their revenue strictly from advertisements,” she says.

In a culture where no one wants to pay for content, and advertising dollars dwindle, the media industry will have to use innovative new strategies and search for new sources of revenue in order to survive.

2 comments:

  1. I really like Baldwin's lead, although it is a run-on sentence. We talked about making it into two sentences, which I think would add more impact.
    There were a few mechanical errors, but overall Baldwin has a very well-written piece. The only thing we talked about was the lead and the atribution of Epperly, which seemed a little too long.
    We talked about using an advertiser as a fourth source.
    Overall, a very good piece that's a follow up to Baldwin's first story.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like the idea for the story, but the front-end of the story runs on a little too long. If you could shorten the lead and make the second paragraph one sentence ... it will get to the point quicker. Also, you start editorializing in the conclusion -- change that. Let a source say what you're saying.

    ReplyDelete